Will Statt said:
Whilst there is no doubt that every generation of 911 is a 'better' car, what makes the 993 special... that people now realise, is that it was a distinct cut off point. It was made in the old fashioned hand-built way, which was slow, uneconomical, and not entirely governed by the accountants. The engine is a real antique.. but beautifully evolved and perfected. They literally " don't make cars like that any more" It'll never drive like a modern car... but who wants it to!?
Not only that, you couldn't make them for £40k either, so either at that price you're getting great value. All those of us that bought before the current market were indeed lucky!
I didn't buy mine for investment: I paid £30k in 2003, and expected it to depreciate slowly. The fact that it hasn't has been a bonus but a bit double edged, as I'm now conscious of not putting too many miles on her. I know that's stupid, but I can't help it... And considering that I have no pension.... it may come in useful!!
The later (996 on) will never appreciate in the same manner, no matter how good they are, because they're just another mass-produced robot-built box. (special editions excepted)
Will
this also applies to the sc, which was going to be the end of aircooling, so was over engineered as a swansong, problem was it sold so many that the natural outcome was better cars during the sc period, then another model in the 3.2, Porsche thought the future was 928 but the public wanted more, hence the 964 then 993.
I firmly believe they made an enormous error getting out of aircooling, you could bring it back with todays thinking, and technology, and easily meet the silly rules criteria.
They should bring back the original chassis with the 993 engine, upgrade the brakes and suspension, keep the car as basic as possible, call it the 911 classic.
Autofarm make one to order, its called the autofarm 911, takes a year to build and emphasis is put on a decent chassis. 100k ive heard.
p.s all aircooled were handmade