apollokre1d
Paul Ricard
- Joined
- 6 Nov 2012
- Messages
- 3,437
Welcome to the @Porsche911UK website. Register a free account today to become a member! Sign up is quick and easy, then you can view, participate in topics and posts across the site that covers all things Porsche.
Already registered and looking to recovery your account, select 'login in' and then the 'forget your password' option.
FZP said:Turbo S looks like a relative bargain.
Like you'd know anything about it :floor: :floor:apollokre1d said:FZP said:Turbo S looks like a relative bargain.
And it wouldn't take much to get it to out accelerate the two cars ahead of it
T8 said:3.9 seconds from the CGT = very impressive
I'm happy that my car matches that and I had enough money left over to buy a house.
MisterCorn said:Unless you are using the absolute top of the range kit with inertial sensors and GNSS you won't get accurate results. The cheap ones are invariably optimistic as they all miss the start. If you use a GPS only system add 0.3-0.4 seconds as a starting point. Some time from 0.5km/h, others at higher speeds and extrapolate backwards. Neither method works well.
MC
Norfolk & Idea said:MisterCorn said:Unless you are using the absolute top of the range kit with inertial sensors and GNSS you won't get accurate results. The cheap ones are invariably optimistic as they all miss the start. If you use a GPS only system add 0.3-0.4 seconds as a starting point. Some time from 0.5km/h, others at higher speeds and extrapolate backwards. Neither method works well.
MC
That's not my experience of timing. I'm not saying you're talking bollox, it just flies in the face of what I've experienced.
I used a stand alone Aim GPS and recorded 0-60 at 3.16. When I attended a Vmax event MB timing clocked me at 3.02. I'd imagine MB timing was the more accurate method. Whatever that is :dont know: