Porsche 911 UK Enthusiasts Online Community Discussion Forum GB

Welcome to the @Porsche911UK website. Register a free account today to become a member! Sign up is quick and easy, then you can view, participate in topics and posts across the site that covers all things Porsche.

Already registered and looking to recovery your account, select 'login in' and then the 'forget your password' option.

Porsche made almost £15k profit on EVERY car sold in 2016

Porsche News

Moderator
Joined
8 Feb 2008
Messages
7,361
Porsche continues to be one of the most profitable car makers on the planet, with 2016's profits of £3.4 billion meaning a profit of approaching £15k per car

that's even before you get to the dealer margins for the car landed in your showroom...

2016Stats-1.jpg


2016 profits didn't go up by the same 25% as they did in 2016 when the Macan arrived, but they did rise by 14% as the Macan continued to power on, with sales of 95,642 – and the Cayenne not far behind.

In fact, despite being a chunk more expensive, Porsche managed to shift 70,867 Cayennes in 2016, which means the Macan and the Cayenne together accounted for more than 70% of Porsche's production, without which sales numbers would have been just 71,269.

But the really impressive thing about Porsche is that even with the arrival of a lower-priced volume model in the Macan, it still managed to make a profit per car in 2016 of £5k. Not exactly on a par with Ferrari, but way ahead of any of the premium German competition.

2016Stats-2.jpg


Commenting on the impressive 2016 results Oliver Blume, Chairman of the Executive Board, said:

"Our final results are very positive. We've successfully completed three major model changes with the 718 Boxster, the 718 Cayman and the new Panamera. We've also invested heavily in future products, electromobility and digitalisation.

At the same time, deliveries rose by 6 per cent from 225,000 to 238,000 vehicles. The operating result even increased by 14 per cent, from EUR 3.4 billion to 3.9 billion. We led the pack in customer satisfaction surveys, such as J. D. Power. We've also created more than 3,000 new jobs. And we've become world champion in motorsport and won the most famous race in the world, Le Mans."


2016Stats-3.jpg

2016Stats-4.jpg
 

Attachments

  • oliverblume600_519.jpg
    oliverblume600_519.jpg
    58.2 KB · Views: 4,170
I would be interested to see a breakdown of profit per model in the range. I suspect the 911 is a lot more profitable than the Macan.
 
This came up for comment yesterday at work when it floated across BBG. It is fascinating to think how this is possible: I think they buy in bodyshells for the trucks (from VW) at a very good price - that must be a factor, plus the Boxster / Cayman bring the unit cost down on the 911 due to the shared front end - meaning it books an even higher margin than it might otherwise. And lastly you only need to glance at the options list for any model and Porsche are ringing the tills. Probably the car they least want to sell you is a completely base spec 982. The opportunity loss must make them weep.

Parts priced like diamonds for their older cars can't hurt and I'd always heard (unconfirmed) that the Motorsport division actullay books a profit in itself.
 
Fair play to them...

They can invest more back into making even better 911's.

Imagine the company was really struggling and going backwards - could spell trouble for a lot of us, so great news - hope the company continues to grow - but never loses its heart and soul... like what is happening to Apple.
 
Porsche made 31648 of all 911 models in 2016 alone. Some months ago a member replied to a question of mine confirming that between 1993 & 1998 they only produces 61,000 of all model 993's. Of course the 993 was mostly hand assembled & Porsche profitability was marginal at best but it highlights today why:
1. The 993 is a better engineered car especially when compared to the M96/7 engine versions.
2. The 993 is a more exclusive & sought after car.
3. The price of a 993 has remained high despite its age. Posts here over the last 2 weeks report values of 1995/6 cars at specialist dealers at £55K and some 1998 wide body S's at top end £70K to £80. The cheapest 1998 996 on Autotrader on a trade sale I found is £10900. Says it all.
 
GARY S said:
Porsche made 31648 of all 911 models in 2016 alone. Some months ago a member replied to a question of mine confirming that between 1993 & 1998 they only produces 61,000 of all model 993's. Of course the 993 was mostly hand assembled & Porsche profitability was marginal at best but it highlights today why:
1. The 993 is a better engineered car especially when compared to the M96/7 engine versions.
2. The 993 is a more exclusive & sought after car.
3. The price of a 993 has remained high despite its age. Posts here over the last 2 weeks report values of 1995/6 cars at specialist dealers at £55K and some 1998 wide body S's at top end £70K to £80. The cheapest 1998 996 on Autotrader on a trade sale I found is £10900. Says it all.

I remember in 2009 when I bought my first 997, there was a 993 in the showroom for £11k ish.... Same seems to be happening now to 996's. There were not as many 993 or 996's made as 997s, and then even less well looked after ones with reasonable/low miles - so that will always push up prices. 5-10 years from now, same will happen to 997s.
 
GARY S said:
Porsche made 31648 of all 911 models in 2016 alone. Some months ago a member replied to a question of mine confirming that between 1993 & 1998 they only produces 61,000 of all model 993's. Of course the 993 was mostly hand assembled & Porsche profitability was marginal at best but it highlights today why:
1. The 993 is a better engineered car especially when compared to the M96/7 engine versions.
2. The 993 is a more exclusive & sought after car.
3. The price of a 993 has remained high despite its age. Posts here over the last 2 weeks report values of 1995/6 cars at specialist dealers at £55K and some 1998 wide body S's at top end £70K to £80. The cheapest 1998 996 on Autotrader on a trade sale I found is £10900. Says it all.

:?

Struggling to see how you can link the profitability of recent times with how well engineered the 993 was, or how using this information you can conclude that the 993 in particular was better engineered than anything since.

If I was writing that post I would have pre-fixed it with 'in my opinion'.

I will agree though that in my opinion the mezger in the 993 is better than the M96/7.
 
Visiting the Porsche factory when the 993 was in production revealed a very old fashioned production regime with engines built not that differently to us and body shells hand welded and shaped in places and clearly the lack of investment in new technology and designs was very prevalent.

At the time Porsche were stated as making the 968 and 993 at a loss and the City said that they would probably go bust.

This often happens when a good product stands the test of time and doesn't need re-designing and profits initially stand up due to minimal investment needed in design, development, production machinery and training but the lack of momentum that ignores modernisation eventually catches up when the amount needed them to make up for years of neglect can be impossible to find = much of British Industry late 20th Century.

The re-investment in the business (to save it) by the family coincided with a change in emphasis that was essential - to make money once again to re-invest in just about every aspect.

When I was the director of engine development at Armstrong I was flown down to Kent to assess the Motorcycle plant of Lord Hesketh similarly in financial trouble with a view to buying it - but found the same - old fashioned designs that cost too much to manufacture (and don't actually work that well either). I remember asking their designer why they had stuck to the old fashioned way of making gearboxes (that was more expensive than the Japanese methodology at the time and didn't work as well) to be told that the Japanese was just wasn't "proper engineering" because it was undeniably cheaper to produce. One still thrives - the other disappeared!

There is nothing wrong with a new design that does exactly the same job just as well as an established one - but costs much less to produce - especially as this allows the business to increase profits and the resulting investment sustains their market position.

But liquid cooling proved necessary (due to emissions legislation), and they tried to keep the flat 6 layout etc in a more cost effective design - and did really well as an entirely new product.

The only problem is if in focussing on a new cost effective design, the company don't make as good a product, or sells it for the same price (supported by the original reputation), make more money but do little or nothing to help fix a few problems their new product has created.

In many ways the 996/7 is as good and in some ways superior to the 993 and the Gen 2 even more so.

Without them we would have no new Porsche's anyway.

I think - in all the circumstances - they have done a brilliant job of renewing the marque so we can avoid the boredom of a standard drive and enjoy the potential performance, looks, image and thrill of driving a Porsche when we go about our daily business.

The only very minor downside was perhaps inevitable with so many new ideas needed to included in a new regime almost over night.

I guess VW will need the profit to pay off the consequences of the emissions scandal anyway but at least there should be enough left to continue to produce fantastic Sports cars that still excite and that I am so glad I am involved with daily.

Baz
 
GARY S said:
Porsche made 31648 of all 911 models in 2016 alone. Some months ago a member replied to a question of mine confirming that between 1993 & 1998 they only produces 61,000 of all model 993's. Of course the 993 was mostly hand assembled & Porsche profitability was marginal at best but it highlights today why:
1. The 993 is a better engineered car especially when compared to the M96/7 engine versions.
2. The 993 is a more exclusive & sought after car.
3. The price of a 993 has remained high despite its age. Posts here over the last 2 weeks report values of 1995/6 cars at specialist dealers at £55K and some 1998 wide body S's at top end £70K to £80. The cheapest 1998 996 on Autotrader on a trade sale I found is £10900. Says it all.

61,000 993s were produced because that is how many the market wanted. To say 993s are more sought after than later cars is plain wrong as the later cars have outsold them by a massive margin. However, their ubiquity is also the later cars' undoing in the used market.

Not quite sure what your point is of comparing the best examples of 993s with the cheapest 996 you could find. To look at it another way, for a mass produced sports car to still be worth £11k after nearly 20 yrs is pretty good!

BTW, excellent post from BazHart.
 
bazhart said:
Visiting the Porsche factory when the 993 was in production revealed a very old fashioned production regime with engines built not that differently to us and body shells hand welded and shaped in places and clearly the lack of investment in new technology and designs was very prevalent.

At the time Porsche were stated as making the 968 and 993 at a loss and the City said that they would probably go bust.

This often happens when a good product stands the test of time and doesn't need re-designing and profits initially stand up due to minimal investment needed in design, development, production machinery and training but the lack of momentum that ignores modernisation eventually catches up when the amount needed them to make up for years of neglect can be impossible to find = much of British Industry late 20th Century.

The re-investment in the business (to save it) by the family coincided with a change in emphasis that was essential - to make money once again to re-invest in just about every aspect.

When I was the director of engine development at Armstrong I was flown down to Kent to assess the Motorcycle plant of Lord Hesketh similarly in financial trouble with a view to buying it - but found the same - old fashioned designs that cost too much to manufacture (and don't actually work that well either). I remember asking their designer why they had stuck to the old fashioned way of making gearboxes (that was more expensive than the Japanese methodology at the time and didn't work as well) to be told that the Japanese was just wasn't "proper engineering" because it was undeniably cheaper to produce. One still thrives - the other disappeared!

There is nothing wrong with a new design that does exactly the same job just as well as an established one - but costs much less to produce - especially as this allows the business to increase profits and the resulting investment sustains their market position.

But liquid cooling proved necessary (due to emissions legislation), and they tried to keep the flat 6 layout etc in a more cost effective design - and did really well as an entirely new product.

The only problem is if in focussing on a new cost effective design, the company don't make as good a product, or sells it for the same price (supported by the original reputation), make more money but do little or nothing to help fix a few problems their new product has created.

In many ways the 996/7 is as good and in some ways superior to the 993 and the Gen 2 even more so.

Without them we would have no new Porsche's anyway.

I think - in all the circumstances - they have done a brilliant job of renewing the marque so we can avoid the boredom of a standard drive and enjoy the potential performance, looks, image and thrill of driving a Porsche when we go about our daily business.

The only very minor downside was perhaps inevitable with so many new ideas needed to included in a new regime almost over night.

I guess VW will need the profit to pay off the consequences of the emissions scandal anyway but at least there should be enough left to continue to produce fantastic Sports cars that still excite and that I am so glad I am involved with daily.

Baz

:agree:
 
Was anyone else surprised by the production / sales figures for Boxsters and Caymans? I had imagined they were the volume product as they are so much cheaper to buy than anything with a 911 badge on it. But it's the other way round - 911s outsell B/Cs by over 25%.

Also, a really interesting post by bazhart above :thumbs:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
124,554
Messages
1,441,467
Members
48,968
Latest member
biel
Back
Top