Just a thought and Alex I am sure will will set me straight on this
Looking at the admittedly quite old 'Which 996' thread, there have been 1152 votes cast, since I think 2012.
On the 'IMS Data' thread, we (Alex) has had 86 responses, with I believe if I am reading the charts correctly, 7 fails. This is a 9% approx failure rate, based on the responses.
Would it not however be reasonable to assume that if 9% of the 'Which 996' responders had experienced an IMS fail (that would be 103 failures) more of those people might have reported the fail on the 'IMS Data' thread.
In other words, the actual failure rate may be a tiny fraction of the indicated 9%?
Rick
Looking at the admittedly quite old 'Which 996' thread, there have been 1152 votes cast, since I think 2012.
On the 'IMS Data' thread, we (Alex) has had 86 responses, with I believe if I am reading the charts correctly, 7 fails. This is a 9% approx failure rate, based on the responses.
Would it not however be reasonable to assume that if 9% of the 'Which 996' responders had experienced an IMS fail (that would be 103 failures) more of those people might have reported the fail on the 'IMS Data' thread.
In other words, the actual failure rate may be a tiny fraction of the indicated 9%?
Rick